Best 6 LSAT Hacks to Get Into Law School

LSAT Hacks

Despite months of using different LSAT hacks to prepare for the LSAT, thousands of aspiring law students still get below-average scores on the exam. According to a recent U.S. News report, only a third of LSAT takers attain the minimum score of 157 required to get into law school. While no strategy can thoroughly prepare students for the LSAT since it tests students’ natural ability, combining various LSAT hacks can help students attain their desired scores. In this post, our exam-help experts explain the effective LSAT strategies students can use to achieve the highest possible score in the LSAT.

LSAT Hacks

Use Our Software

Students taking a proctored LSAT exam can use our software to bypass the exam’s strict anti-cheating protocols. Our software has improvised features designed to beat the LSAT proctoring platform security, allowing our experts to do the exam for students. Furthermore, our expert exam takers are Master’s and Ph.D. holders in law who are familiar with the LSAT. It is one of the best LSAT Hacks which guarantees our clients the best possible grade to get into law school and offer money back on failed exams.

Learn the Logic Principles

The logical reasoning section of the LSAT hack is arguably the most important, as questions here examine students’ logical thinking. Before taking the exam, students must understand the various logical principles to increase their chances of passing it. About 26 logical principles exist in the LSAT, but only five principles appear in many LSAT exams. They include:

Conditional Reasoning

This LSAT hack principle examines the relationship between activities using sufficient and necessary assumptions. In an exam, students might need to determine the validity of assumptions in a statement based on the evidence or facts present.

For example, if John went to the supermarket, Joan must have driven him there. If evidence shows John doesn’t own a car or can’t drive, then the assumption in the statement could be true.

Over-generalization

The principle of over-generalization investigates arguments with too broad conclusions and little evidence to support them. LSAT questions might ask students to determine if the evidence present in a passage is too narrow to base the inferences and conclusions.

Negative Proof Fallacy

The negative proof fallacy states that just because a statement might be true doesn’t make it so unless enough evidence backs it up. In this section, students might be asked to question or disapprove arguments based on the proof available, not what seems true.

Correlation vs. Cause and Effect

The correlation vs. cause-and-effect principle investigates how two simultaneous activities depend on each other. Questions on this principle require students to show that one event is the direct cause of another and vice versa.

Missing Assumption

The missing assumption in this LSAT hack principle investigates the statements in an argument to determine if there are unwarranted assumptions. Questions ask students to analyze passages and assess whether crucial assumptions are missing.

Take an Actual LSAT Hack Practice Exam in a Testing Environment

Reading without practice is a sure way to fail the LSAT. Students should demonstrate or apply their understanding of principles and other concepts through a practical LSAT exam. Practice exams make students more comfortable taking the actual LSAT and familiarize them with the examinable concepts. However, for the best outcome, students should take the practice exam in a strict area similar to the LSAT testing environment, including strict timing and exam testing area conditions.

Analyze Results and Improve

Analyzing the results of a practice exam is essential to maximizing the LSAT score. Final practice exam results show the questions students answered correctly and incorrectly in each section. Aspiring law students can use the information to identify their weak and strong areas in the exam and improve on them to reach the minimum grade for a top 14 law school.

Understand the Logic Games

The analytical reasoning section of the LSAT tests students’ comprehension of logic games. Students should master the setup of different logic games before answering the section questions. Breaking down logic games first requires careful analysis of the information in an argument.

Then, students should categorize the logic game into ordering, assigning, or grouping based on the passage details. Some passages may feature a single skill, while others could test multiple categories. Finally, students should create a visual representation of the game rules and infer additional regulations using the information in the logic game.

Familiarize with LSAT Guideposts

The reading comprehension section tests students’ ability to identify vital information from passages and draw inferences. Students can use guideposts or markers to detect the main concepts, opinions, and tones in an argument when reading passages for the first time. Noting important details prevents students from revisiting the passage many times, saving time to cover all questions within 35 minutes. It is also one of the safest LSAT hacks to try out.

LSAT Hacks for Passing Your Upcoming Exam

These are the most effective LSAT hacks for aspiring law students to consider before the exam to increase their chances of passing. While no specific method is sure to get students excellent grades, combining them makes it possible to excel in the LSAT. Our LSAT exam takers can help students with their upcoming LSAT exam, ensuring they get the grades required to enroll in law school.

Leave a Reply